Why Everia

The ticket that remembers,
for people and agents.

AI agents now do real work on every team, and what they do disappears into terminals and chat windows. Everia is the workspace where people and agents work on the same ticket, and the ticket keeps the full record of what each of them did.

Free for up to 3 members · €12 per member · Viewers free

Six things Everia does that the others don't

Other tools are ledgers that people update about work done somewhere else. These are the places where Everia works differently.

Context

The ticket is the memory of the work, including the agent's work

In most tools an agent works for an hour and the ticket says done. The reasoning stays in a terminal nobody else sees, and the next person starts from nothing. In Everia the work is written back to the ticket, so whoever picks it up next, person or agent, starts with the whole story.

  • ✓Commits and pull requests are recorded on the ticket, whether a person or a coding agent wrote them
  • ✓What the assistant read, changed and created is kept with the ticket
  • ✓Comments, status changes, time and test results sit in one history
  • ✓Direct connections for your own coding agent are next on the roadmap

Accountability

Agents that answer for what they do

After public incidents of agents deleting data, the rule teams ask for is simple: show the plan, let a person approve it, keep a record. Everia's assistant follows it.

  • ✓It works through the same permissions as the member using it
  • ✓It asks for confirmation before anything destructive
  • ✓AI credits belong to the workspace, with a visible balance

Europe

Your data stays in the EU

Everia is a Swedish company under the Swedish data protection authority. Most tools in this category are US companies with a US default.

  • ✓Choose the EU region at signup, at the same price
  • ✓Published DPA
  • ✓Sub-processors listed by name for each region

Depth

Tickets, tests, docs and time in one system

A requirement becomes tickets, the tickets carry test cases, and test runs show what passed. Nothing has to be reconciled across tools before a release.

  • ✓Test cases and test runs are built in, not an add-on
  • ✓Docs are connected to the tickets they describe
  • ✓Time is logged on the ticket and compared against the estimate
  • ✓Tickets and time from Slack, Telegram and WhatsApp, for people who never open a browser

Pricing

Pricing with nothing hidden

Free for up to 3 members. €12 per member for teams. Enterprise is quoted per organization. Every module is in every plan.

  • ✓Viewers read and comment for free: 10 on Free, 25 on Team
  • ✓No minimum seats and no seat blocks
  • ✓No AI charge per user
  • ✓Single sign-on is never sold as an upgrade

No expert required

The team runs it. Nobody is hired to operate the tool.

Jira and ClickUp are flexible enough that companies employ certified admins or pay outside consultants to configure and maintain them. That is a salary or a day rate spent only on using software they already pay for. Everia needs no training: setup is guided and quick, and the people who use it are the people who run it.

  • ✓Guided setup in five steps, with a sample project to explore first
  • ✓Statuses and flows are edited by the team, per project
  • ✓No schemes, no plugin marketplace, no certification track
  • ✓Importers bring an existing backlog across from Jira, Linear, ClickUp and Asana

What people say about the tools they use today

We read the public reviews. The same complaints come up for each product.

Jira

  • Needs a paid expert

    Companies hire certified admins or consultants only to configure and maintain it.

  • Overwhelming to set up

    A crowded interface, confusing project types, and simple jobs that take a search to figure out.

  • Clunky day to day

    Reviewers call it cumbersome and short on visual clarity.

  • Inactive sites get deleted

    Unused free sites can be deactivated and removed, along with their data.

Everia vs Jira →

Linear

  • Stops at issue tracking

    Tests, docs and time tracking live in other tools.

  • Strains as the roadmap grows

    Reviewers say it struggles beyond a small team or a single team's roadmap.

  • Becomes a pile of abandoned issues

    Without guidance on filters and roadmaps, workspaces fill with tasks nobody closes.

Everia vs Linear →

Notion

  • Building the system instead of doing the work

    Teams spend more time designing databases than delivering.

  • Slow with large workspaces

    Reviewers report lag and display bugs in the desktop app.

  • Imports that lose data

    Reviewers describe lost images on migration and automated support replies.

Everia vs Notion →

Trello

  • Outgrown quickly

    Too little depth for larger teams and projects.

  • The plugin hunt

    Basic project features come from Power-Ups.

  • Easy to lose track

    Mentions and assignments go unnoticed.

Everia vs Trello →

ClickUp

  • Needs a paid expert

    Teams bring in verified consultants to design and untangle their workspace.

  • Feature bloat and lag

    Slow reloads and a different experience on web and mobile.

  • New features before fixes

    Reviewers say AI add-ons arrive while bugs and promised updates wait.

  • Limits inside unlimited plans

    Hidden caps, and AI sold per user on top.

Everia vs ClickUp →

Their complaint, our answer

Each row is something Everia does today. Where we have no answer yet, the next section says so.

The complaintHeard aboutWhat Everia does
What the AI agent did is lost when its session endsEvery toolCommits, pull requests and the assistant's actions are recorded on the ticket, so context carries over to the next person or agent.
We pay an expert a heavy fee only to use the platformJira, ClickUpNo admin to hire, no consultant to brief and no course to take. Setup is guided, and the team that uses Everia is the team that runs it.
Too complex. Simple jobs take a search to figure out.Jira, ClickUpA sample project to explore first. The team edits its own statuses per project. There are no schemes and no plugin layer to configure.
We spend our time building the system instead of working in itNotionThe structure is already there: tickets, tests, docs and time arrive connected. You fill in the work.
We outgrew it, and every missing feature is another pluginTrelloSprints, Gantt, dependencies, feature, story and task levels, tests, docs and time are in the product and in every plan.
Tests, docs and time live in three other toolsLinear, JiraThey are modules of the same workspace, linked to the same tickets.
AI is pushed at us, or sold per user on topJira, ClickUpThe assistant appears when you call it and asks before it deletes. Credits are included per workspace. Extra credits are a one-time pack, never a seat charge.
The plan said unlimited and then we hit the limitsClickUpEvery module is in every plan, and the few limits there are, members, projects and viewers, are printed on the pricing page.
Our workspace was deleted for being inactiveJiraThere is no clock on the free workspace. Nothing expires.
Assignments and mentions get missedTrelloMentions, assignments and watched tickets notify you in the app and by email, and teams can route updates to Slack.
Moving in meant retyping everythingNotionImporters for Jira, Linear, ClickUp and Asana, plus CSV and Excel files.
Stakeholders and clients can't see the board without a paid seatJira, LinearViewers read and comment for free.
Our data sits with a US company by defaultMost toolsSwedish company, EU region at signup, published DPA, sub-processors named.

Everia fits you if

  • ✓You are a team of roughly 10 to 50 that plans, builds and tests on a cadence
  • ✓You pay for an issue tracker, a test tool and a wiki, and reconcile them by hand
  • ✓You already use coding agents and want their work on the record
  • ✓You sell into Europe, or a customer has asked where your data lives
  • ✓You are an agency whose clients should see progress without a paid seat
  • ✓You run marketing, HR or operations work and part of the team works from chat

Look elsewhere for now if

  • ~You need one board across many teams, with swimlanes. Everia's boards are per project.
  • ~You need several assignees on one ticket. Everia tickets have one owner.
  • ~Your company depends on the wider Atlassian suite, such as a service desk or Bitbucket.
  • ~You want the fastest keyboard-driven issue tracker and nothing else. Linear is very good at that.

We would rather you hear it here than find out in month three.

Start with one project

Free for up to 3 members, with no card and no clock. Add a fourth member when the team is ready.

Free for up to 3 members · €12 per member · Viewers free